<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekend Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iffles.com/2010/01/17/weekend-links-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iffles.com/2010/01/17/weekend-links-20/</link>
	<description>phototalk for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:55:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maureen Brundage</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2010/01/17/weekend-links-20/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen Brundage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=481#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iffles</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2010/01/17/weekend-links-20/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>iffles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=481#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Well, part of the problem is that Picasa is more of a RAW file &lt;i&gt;viewer&lt;/i&gt; as opposed to an editor. The beauty of RAW files (as I&#039;m sure you know, since you&#039;re using UFRAW) is the ability to adjust things - like the white balance.  Picasa doesn&#039;t really give you the ability to do that on the RAW file itself - it determines how it should be converted and just does it.  Whereas UFRAW gives &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; the power to do it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That being said, I use Picasa to view my RAW files to determine which ones I want to edit, and I haven&#039;t really noticed that much of a difference. I did a quick search on the internet, though, and you don&#039;t seem to be the only person with this complaint.  The only other thing I can think of is that you might have the White Balance dropdown in UFRAW set to something other than Camera WB.  For instance, if you have it set to Auto WB - I&#039;ve often thought that UFRAW&#039;s Auto WB is a bit too blue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, part of the problem is that Picasa is more of a RAW file <i>viewer</i> as opposed to an editor. The beauty of RAW files (as I&#39;m sure you know, since you&#39;re using UFRAW) is the ability to adjust things &#8211; like the white balance.  Picasa doesn&#39;t really give you the ability to do that on the RAW file itself &#8211; it determines how it should be converted and just does it.  Whereas UFRAW gives <i>you</i> the power to do it.</p>
<p>That being said, I use Picasa to view my RAW files to determine which ones I want to edit, and I haven&#39;t really noticed that much of a difference. I did a quick search on the internet, though, and you don&#39;t seem to be the only person with this complaint.  The only other thing I can think of is that you might have the White Balance dropdown in UFRAW set to something other than Camera WB.  For instance, if you have it set to Auto WB &#8211; I&#39;ve often thought that UFRAW&#39;s Auto WB is a bit too blue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen Brundage</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2010/01/17/weekend-links-20/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen Brundage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=481#comment-399</guid>
		<description>I have UFRAW my images have this overall bluish tint to them when I openthe. When I open my Raw images in Picassa they are not. Any insight from you on this would be appreciated.&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;Mo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have UFRAW my images have this overall bluish tint to them when I openthe. When I open my Raw images in Picassa they are not. Any insight from you on this would be appreciated.<br />Thanks,<br />Mo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iffles</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2010/01/17/weekend-links-20/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>iffles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=481#comment-394</guid>
		<description>On most days I went for the best photo... but then on special days (like birthdays and anniversaries), i tried to go with something really represented the day.  You really can&#039;t go wrong either way, though!  Which I suppose is what makes it such a tough debate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On most days I went for the best photo&#8230; but then on special days (like birthdays and anniversaries), i tried to go with something really represented the day.  You really can&#39;t go wrong either way, though!  Which I suppose is what makes it such a tough debate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CanSan</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2010/01/17/weekend-links-20/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>CanSan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=481#comment-378</guid>
		<description>First of all nice site, I can&#039;t believe I never saw this earlier. Bookmarked!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve also started a simple photography site last year and it&#039;s coming along very slowly but nicely. Would love it if you take a look sometime:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.notesonphotography.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.notesonphotography.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all nice site, I can&#39;t believe I never saw this earlier. Bookmarked!</p>
<p>I&#39;ve also started a simple photography site last year and it&#39;s coming along very slowly but nicely. Would love it if you take a look sometime:   <a href="http://www.notesonphotography.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.notesonphotography.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2010/01/17/weekend-links-20/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=481#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Yay! Loved the snow photography tips from Ronan Palliser!&lt;br&gt;(It just sounds so do-able!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now to find some snow... &lt;br&gt;Not much here in Central Cali, that&#039;s for sure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! Loved the snow photography tips from Ronan Palliser!<br />(It just sounds so do-able!)</p>
<p>Now to find some snow&#8230; <br />Not much here in Central Cali, that&#39;s for sure.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2010/01/17/weekend-links-20/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=481#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for the link!  Incidentally, what did you end up deciding in the best photo vs. most representative photo debate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for the link!  Incidentally, what did you end up deciding in the best photo vs. most representative photo debate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
