<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAW vs Jpg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/</link>
	<description>phototalk for the rest of us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:55:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: iffles</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>iffles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=222#comment-393</guid>
		<description>D&#039;oh!  Yes, that is what I meant.  I&#039;ve fixed it now - thanks for pointing it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#39;oh!  Yes, that is what I meant.  I&#39;ve fixed it now &#8211; thanks for pointing it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daisy_dpksh</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>daisy_dpksh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=222#comment-387</guid>
		<description>When you said &quot;...or have a piece of software on your camera that can view RAW files.&quot;   do you mean a piece of software on your *computer*?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you said &#8220;&#8230;or have a piece of software on your camera that can view RAW files.&#8221;   do you mean a piece of software on your *computer*?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iffles</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>iffles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=222#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I convert every photo that I edit into jpg once I&#039;m done editing, yes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know how you&#039;re converting to jpg, but I don&#039;t seem to experience the pixelated problem.  Check out whatever options you&#039;re using when saving it as jpg - for instance, I use Gimp, and I just do Save As and then save with a .jpg extension - I&#039;ll get a second dialog box that asks what Quality I want, and I set it to 100%, there&#039;s also a bunch of Advanced options I&#039;ve never looked at, keeping the default values.  Perhaps whatever program you&#039;re using has some options, too?  And maybe something&#039;s set there that&#039;s trying to optimize for file size and not image quality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve also heard that some programs like Photoshop have a &quot;Save for web&quot; and that you shouldn&#039;t use that because it delivers poor results. I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s true or not, just something I read somewhere once!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I convert every photo that I edit into jpg once I&#39;m done editing, yes.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t know how you&#39;re converting to jpg, but I don&#39;t seem to experience the pixelated problem.  Check out whatever options you&#39;re using when saving it as jpg &#8211; for instance, I use Gimp, and I just do Save As and then save with a .jpg extension &#8211; I&#39;ll get a second dialog box that asks what Quality I want, and I set it to 100%, there&#39;s also a bunch of Advanced options I&#39;ve never looked at, keeping the default values.  Perhaps whatever program you&#39;re using has some options, too?  And maybe something&#39;s set there that&#39;s trying to optimize for file size and not image quality.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve also heard that some programs like Photoshop have a &#8220;Save for web&#8221; and that you shouldn&#39;t use that because it delivers poor results. I don&#39;t know if that&#39;s true or not, just something I read somewhere once!  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitra</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=222#comment-110</guid>
		<description>This is really informative and has helped me a lot. One thing I&#039;m wondering about is do you always convert your raw files to jpg once you&#039;ve finished editing or just when you intend to print them or post them online? I&#039;ve just begun to shoot in raw but I&#039;ve found that once I convert to jpg the pictures are looking very pixelated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really informative and has helped me a lot. One thing I&#39;m wondering about is do you always convert your raw files to jpg once you&#39;ve finished editing or just when you intend to print them or post them online? I&#39;ve just begun to shoot in raw but I&#39;ve found that once I convert to jpg the pictures are looking very pixelated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen321</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=222#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Hi.  I&#039;m just getting back into photography, collecting many cameras and lenses and starting to seriously shoot.  Found your web site and I like what you are doing.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Was going to pick up the latest Rebel and lenses this fall but opted to go with a Mamiya 645 Medium format film camera instead.  Just love medium format and am shooting 6x6 and now, 6x4.5 as well.  Still have my digital point and click and it&#039;s perfect for some situations and has some add-ons like a wide angle converter and a tele-photo converter so it&#039;s somewhat flexible for a small digital with a fixed zoom lens.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well come back in a few weeks and explore your web site a bit more, your gallery shots are interesting.  I like the way you have been able to take a common subject where one would be tempted to say there is nothing of interest and you&#039;ve turned it into something of interest.   I&#039;ve selected a nearby historic village for my first major and long term project and will do the web site thing with it as I start to accumulate images worth publishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.  I&#39;m just getting back into photography, collecting many cameras and lenses and starting to seriously shoot.  Found your web site and I like what you are doing.   </p>
<p>Was going to pick up the latest Rebel and lenses this fall but opted to go with a Mamiya 645 Medium format film camera instead.  Just love medium format and am shooting 6&#215;6 and now, 6&#215;4.5 as well.  Still have my digital point and click and it&#39;s perfect for some situations and has some add-ons like a wide angle converter and a tele-photo converter so it&#39;s somewhat flexible for a small digital with a fixed zoom lens.</p>
<p>Well come back in a few weeks and explore your web site a bit more, your gallery shots are interesting.  I like the way you have been able to take a common subject where one would be tempted to say there is nothing of interest and you&#39;ve turned it into something of interest.   I&#39;ve selected a nearby historic village for my first major and long term project and will do the web site thing with it as I start to accumulate images worth publishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=222#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Great article! I just made the switch from point-and-shoot to DSLR a little more than a month ago. One of the settings I changed was to shoot primarily in JPEG. I opted to go with this choice primarily for greater number pictures that could be stored vs. RAW or RAW + JPEG options. I just did a comparison for myself and I&#039;m impressed with the results that RAW gave me! Like you, I will most likely stick with JPEG for family gatherings and other general things. However, I will certainly go for RAW for more critical shoots. Looks like I&#039;ll need to up my compactflash arsenal - LOL. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I plan to give it a go at a wedding that I&#039;m attending this weekend. I&#039;m not the official photographer (thankfully for the Bride &amp; Groom - I&#039;m still a novice), so I have a chance to experiment and really put my new camera to the test. I expect exposure and lighting to be issues, so shooting in RAW will allow me to fix any of those issues after the fact. Though it won&#039;t totally make up for my relative lack of skills... ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! I just made the switch from point-and-shoot to DSLR a little more than a month ago. One of the settings I changed was to shoot primarily in JPEG. I opted to go with this choice primarily for greater number pictures that could be stored vs. RAW or RAW + JPEG options. I just did a comparison for myself and I&#39;m impressed with the results that RAW gave me! Like you, I will most likely stick with JPEG for family gatherings and other general things. However, I will certainly go for RAW for more critical shoots. Looks like I&#39;ll need to up my compactflash arsenal &#8211; LOL. </p>
<p>I plan to give it a go at a wedding that I&#39;m attending this weekend. I&#39;m not the official photographer (thankfully for the Bride &#038; Groom &#8211; I&#39;m still a novice), so I have a chance to experiment and really put my new camera to the test. I expect exposure and lighting to be issues, so shooting in RAW will allow me to fix any of those issues after the fact. Though it won&#39;t totally make up for my relative lack of skills&#8230; ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobwalley</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>bobwalley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=222#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I have been back and forth between shooting in jpg and RAW.  I know the process behind each but have not done the side by side comparison that you have done for me.  That being said, I&#039;ve decided to shoot RAW files all the time now based on what I have read and seen here.  Thanks for helping me with my decision</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been back and forth between shooting in jpg and RAW.  I know the process behind each but have not done the side by side comparison that you have done for me.  That being said, I&#39;ve decided to shoot RAW files all the time now based on what I have read and seen here.  Thanks for helping me with my decision</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=222#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I keep meaning to try out RAW some time, but haven&#039;t flipped the switch yet.  Thanks for the great comparison between the two.  The beauty of digital is that it doesn&#039;t cost anything to do a little experimentation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep meaning to try out RAW some time, but haven&#8217;t flipped the switch yet.  Thanks for the great comparison between the two.  The beauty of digital is that it doesn&#8217;t cost anything to do a little experimentation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=222#comment-94</guid>
		<description>I am really happy I found your site via DPS.  Thanks for the info and the comparisons.  I feel like such a beginner and hope I can advance as you have over the next year.  I bought my first DSLR last month and I am becoming a photo information nut.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Luke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really happy I found your site via DPS.  Thanks for the info and the comparisons.  I feel like such a beginner and hope I can advance as you have over the next year.  I bought my first DSLR last month and I am becoming a photo information nut.  </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Luke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iffles</title>
		<link>http://iffles.com/2009/09/07/raw-vs-jpg/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>iffles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iffles.com/?p=222#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Dude. I LOVE my drobo.  I currently have 2 1TB drives in mine.  It&#039;s also probably a bad idea because I don&#039;t bother doing any cutting back of images and I save every single one.  Even ones that should obviously be rejects.  But... drobo!  I can&#039;t help myself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude. I LOVE my drobo.  I currently have 2 1TB drives in mine.  It&#39;s also probably a bad idea because I don&#39;t bother doing any cutting back of images and I save every single one.  Even ones that should obviously be rejects.  But&#8230; drobo!  I can&#39;t help myself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
